Connect with The Epinal

Recent Comments

Archives

Council Must Act Upon Revelations

After the revelations that student and Cayley Hall committee candidate, Piers Currell, used black make up for hall hustings, Union Council must bring the Students’ Union into line with the rest of society.

The Students’ Union’s lack of disciplinary policy for students who use black make up is absurd. Plans I put forward were attacked and ridiculed by students, but for those that have seen the picture of Piers Currell wilfully “blacking up” have found it shocking.

This level of ignorance needs not only to be shown to be wrong through a campaign by the Students Union, but a disciplinary policy is now necessary to back it up. Otherwise this will happen again.

When students complained on Twitter about the picture being put on the Label Online Facebook page, it was immediately taken down. This, as far as I’m concerned, can only be described as brushing the issue under the carpet rather than taking necessary action to stop students from dressing in this manner.

Whilst this exercise in dressing offensively has been confirmed by the vast majority as inappropriate, it is difficult to police those dressed in what has been deemed as “bad taste”. It is perhaps better in this case to educate students about the offence this may cause. That is, those who dress in this case as Jimmy Savile and Oscar Pistorius.

The Students’ Union should ban racist make up, that which can obviously be identified as racist.

Whilst the student concerned may have merely been ignorant to the actual historical meaning of using black make up, we must educate students, an exercise which the Union has failed to do thus far.

If Union Council does not act, then we risk alienating students from ethnic minority backgrounds in the name of that growingly infamous word “banter” which some students believe entitles them to behave in any manner they see fit.

We need to establish boundaries at Loughborough Students’ Union, ones that appropriately protect minority groups on the one hand and disciplines those who cross these boundaries on the other.

I cannot guarantee the motion I’ll be putting forward at the next Union Council will pass, but I hope councillors see the reason and accept the inevitability of the steps we need to take to create a fair and inclusive Students’ Union.

Chris Carter
Chris is a former Comment Editor of The Epinal.
Chris Carter
Chris Carter

Latest posts by Chris Carter (see all)

Posted by on March 10, 2013. Filed under Comment.
  • Jay Pugh

    Everyone knows that it is offensive to black up, what would be the point of an educational campaign? The guy did it to prove how dedicated he is to his hall – I imagine it was picked as an outfit because it is offensive, so actually doing it would suggest the guy was very dedicated and willing to cause some people offence if it meant that he would be elected.

    People already know about slavery, civil rights movements and the unequal place that many minorities hold in societies in every country in the world. For that reason, running an educational campaign is an incredible waste of money.

  • Chris Carter

    How is it showing you’re dedicated to your hall? Literally, just explain that to me, because I’m a little in the dark on this one.

  • Jay Pugh

    By dressing up as something/someone offensive you are showing that you are willing to do something that will no doubt get you ridicule. The point is though, that you’re willing to do it for your hall.

    I do not agree with it at all, but I think that is supposed to be the logic behind it.

  • Curious

    Why is (aside from the historical context of the minstrels) ‘blacking up’ deemed immediately racist?

    Can I ask if four guys decided to dress up at Hey Ewe as the A-Team and one of them used make-up to darken and blacken their skin to represent Mr T – would they be deemed racist for doing so?

    I would argue they’re looking for a good night out and paying homage to the man that is Mr T (by far and away the best character on the show and the guy that everybody wanted to be like – even if means I ain’t gettin on no plane and drinkin no milk) – not because they are racist…ergo ‘blacking up’ is not racist by default, but it depends more on the context of said activity that would define whether the activity is racist or not.

    Or are we just better living in the realm he’s got black make-up on, lets just say he’s racist and causing offence just in case?