Connect with The Epinal

Recent Comments

Archives

Wage Review Won’t Create Ultimate Grad Job

Yesterday it was revealed that David Haines, who is running for VP Democracy and Communications, has suggested he plans on reviewing the wages that the members of Exec receive because he believes that “in order to make it the ultimate grad job it needs to be competitive with other jobs of a similar nature.”

Now, speaking as someone who is a fan of the Exec and the Exec Elections, I don’t support this move because, quite frankly, I don’t believe that the role of exec is the ultimate grad job. The role of Exec is a great stepping stone towards the ultimate grad job, but it’s definitely not the ultimate grad job itself, and this can be shown in one very simple way.

Imagine that the exec wages were boosted up to the even more handsome figure of £20,000 pounds from the current £16,000 (which doesn’t include things such as clothing budgets) and you were offered a position on exec or a job with a reputable company for the same amount, which would you choose?

I imagine most of us would choose the job out in the real world making a name for ourselves rather than sticking around in our university town for another year. The role of Exec allows students to demonstrate they have great leadership and interpersonal skills on top of being somewhat charismatic, but it definitely doesn’t compare to getting a job out in the real world.

The thing is, the role of Exec technically isn’t even a graduate job. The role of sabbatical officer traditionally was aimed at second year students, allowing them to take a year out of their degree to gain some work experience (and money) before returning to their studies and completing their degree.

Finalists running for this position is something that has evolved as many people would rather run when they have spent time networking and building up contacts over three years, and thus have a better chance of winning.

This brings me to my next point, for many candidates getting onto Exec revolves around ensuring you know as many people as possible; this is why we haven’t seen an increase in applications for the Exec team this year, even with the £100 cap on campaigns.

It’s highly unlikely that the majority of the student body will be any more motivated to run for Exec if the wages were increased, because at the end of the day being if not popular, but well known in Loughborough gives you a huge advantage when it comes to running for Exec and this simply doesn’t apply to the majority of the Loughborough population.

Consequently, I think it’s misguided to assume reviewing the Exec wages will encourage more people to run for Exec because at the end of day, many people don’t have the motivation to run for something that you arguably have to be a BNOC for, and also, after three years in Loughborough some people simply want to move on.

Zoe Mumba

Zoe Mumba

Executive Features Editor
Zoe is Executive Features Editor of The Epinal. She is in charge of the Features Section of the website, adding a broad range of content and shining a light on pertinent issues.
Zoe Mumba

@zoeeealice

English Student, Biscuiteer, Blogger and raging feminist who is distressingly left wing. Occasionally funny. All views are that of the BBC.
Posted by on February 18, 2013. Filed under Comment,Elections.
  • Voter

    This makes a lot of assumptions. “I imagine…”, “…doesn’t compare…”. Has the writer ever been on the exec or graduated and got a job?

    • Zoe

      Hi!
      I’m currently a second year so no, I haven’t had a grad job nor have I decided to run for Exec. However, I still think the points I make are valid. After all, it’s only last year that we had a Societies Federation President who had no prior involvement in the section whatsoever. That’s not to say he did a bad job, but his campaign was certainly helped by the fact he was a well known, and well liked person.
      It’s very rare that we see someone running for Exec who is not well known on campus, or at least within their section, and these types of people are a minority at Loughborough which in turn reflects why not many people run for the position of Exec.
      I believe my point also still stands with the Exec role being a great stepping stone to the ultimate grad job, rather than being the ultimate grad job itself. The role gives you a lot of transferable skills, but the position is only for a year, and you still have to find a job when you have completed your year. The role of Exec is a good C.V booster which is seen in how previous Exec members have gone onto great things, and how some of the current Exec have exciting things in the pipeline, but there’s still no guarantee of a job at the end of it.

      I appreciate your comment though!

  • Matt

    Whilst increasing the fees will make the job slightly more appealing/viable for some, the main reason that people should be applying for the role is a love for the section.
    The £16,000 seems low but considering that the exec enjoy student prices galore from cheap drinks at the Union and in town to low rents. Yes you’ll be expected to work long hours and be pushed close to breaking point but you applied because your dedicated and this is what you expect.
    The point of getting ‘known’ during your time at university is interesting because it often requires some years to get enough experience to feel ready for the role. After all, being at the head of a 2000+ section shouldn’t be something you just walk into. Conversely though due to the low number of candidates every year it wouldn’t be unexpected if someone were to win with a strong campaign against someone with more notoriety.
    I know that I would have applied this year had I not known the section I’m in would be in good hands (and it conflicts with my course).