Connect with The Epinal

Recent Comments

Archives

University “May Consider Disciplinary Action” Over Hustings Costumes

Two Cayley Hall committee candidates have had their campaigning fancy dress described as “very poor taste” by Loughborough University, while another is said to have breached the University’s Equality and Diversity Policy.

Jak Cooper, who ran to be Cayley social secretary in November 2012, was challenged to dress up as the now disgraced television celebrity Jimmy Saville.

A candidate standing in the current Cayley Hall hustings, also standing for social secretary, Andrew Bargh, has recently been campaigning dressed as Oscar Pistorius, the Paralympic sprinter facing murder charges in South Africa.

In addition, HGM candidate, Piers Currell, has been pictured changing the colour of his skin using black face paint.

Jak Cooper went on to lose his campaign to become Cayley Hall social secretary in November.

“I can see how it may be in poor taste yet the Jimmy scandal reflects no representation of what my character is like, nor that of my hall,” he told The Epinal.

A spokesperson for the University told The Epinal:

“The wearing of fancy dress is part of student life. However, we would consider dressing, as alleged, in costumes that could cause offence to be in very poor taste and would strongly discourage students from doing so.”

Andrew Bargh declined to comment. He tweeted from his personal twitter account, “already got some people hating on this outfit #apologies.”

Ben Samuels, the Cayley Hall Chair, told The Epinal committee candidates were not forced to wear these “poor taste” outfits.

“It’s a matter of opinion if you find it inappropriate. Hustings candidates are not ‘forced’ into doing anything. The fancy dress is included in the challenges set by the previous committee member. As I said, it’s up to the candidates whether or not they participate.”

Loughborough Students Union President Ellie Read stopped short of condemning the actions of the candidates in question and stated in relation to Hall hustings:

“Hall hustings are run by each individual hall and they set their own standards in the running of all their events. We support and advise halls where appropriate and when requested for the events that they run. All behaviour of students is regulated by university guidelines and these can be found online in the student handbook.

“Any behaviours or actions that cause upset or offence is something the Union wouldn’t condone and specifically the issue of fancy dress in the union is something we’re looking into and is an on-going discussion that involved a detailed presentation to union council by the executive.

“The union always encourages students to think about how their actions and behaviours might cause offense or upset to others.”

Outgoing HSF President, Tom Allright, met with Samuels to discuss the matter.

“This is an issue that HSF has not taken lightly. We have moved swiftly within our capacity to resolve the problem. HSF has spoken with the Hall chair of Cayley about the issue and highlighted the significance and sensitivity of the problem.

“More importantly, the negative effects on the hall and students who have been insulted in the wider campus are HSF’s primary concern.

“Ultimately, HSF has no power over Halls, the outcome ultimately rests with the university. HSF must look into the interest of students and how we can make sure this is an issue which is treated properly.”

Since the cases of Cooper and Bargh came to light, it has been established that a further committee candidate in Cayley was ‘blacking-up’ using face paint. Piers Currell, running for HGM Chair, was pictured wearing the fancy dress by a Label Magazine photographer in the Union.

Currell was also unavailable for comment, but Loughborough University told The Epinal:

“Every member of the University community is obliged to ensure that their behaviour and actions do not discriminate against others, in accordance with the University’s Equality and Diversity Policy.

“Dressing up in this manner is in contravention of this policy. The University takes any such breach seriously and may consider taking disciplinary action against those involved.”

Chris Carter
Chris is a former Comment Editor of The Epinal.
Chris Carter
Chris Carter

Latest posts by Chris Carter (see all)

Posted by on March 8, 2013. Filed under News.
  • Rambo

    Perhaps your motion wasn’t as far of the mark as people seemed to think Chris…it would appear that we’re already held to such a standard by the University. I wonder, will the Union move forward with something now?

  • Chris Carter

    I’ll be uploading a comment piece about this later Rambo :)

  • Lodge

    I think the Union running a campaign which filters through Hall can only be beneficial. I think it’s naivety rather than anything more sinister but perception does need to change and Chris Carter, even though his plans were torn apart I think at it’s root can only result in a positive. It’s not a blanket ruling, it’s just use a bit of initiative.

  • Former Exec Member

    Thought Police Alert WOO WOO WOO!!!

    Sure its poor taste to dress as Jimmy Saville in light of what he has done. But when is it against the law to dress in a shellsuit walking about saying ‘now then now then’?

    Why should someone face University disciplinary action for this? Were they queuing up with pitch forks baying for this lads life at Cayley Hustings or actually were they all having a good laugh at what was being done effectively in a members club open to those only of Cayley Hall? If it was deemed such a problematic issue at the time why did the Hall Chair not ask them to go away and change into another costume (let us not forget this is actively encouraged at hall level)

    This is a wider problem in society that people in positions of assumed authority (i.e. some bureaucratic kn*%ber at the University) are entitled to take offence on behalf of the community on what is deemed appropriate or not appropriate by their own set standards.

    Freedom of speech and expression our paramount to our society yet we are prepared to tolerate the ‘liberal nazis’ tell us what is and isn’t appropriate and have careers, characters and livelihoods ruined as a result.

    What do you think Epinal Team?

    • Anon

      I am not someone in a position of ‘assumed authority’, I am a survivor of acts of sexual abuse and I can tell you on behalf of other victims that someone finding it comedic to dress as Jimmy Saville is an issue.

      Strip away all the ‘banter’ and people being ‘coerced’ into dressing up (really-these are 18 year olds at least-they are far capable of refusal) and all this behaviour suggests is that sexual abuse is amusing and should be laughed at.

      Seeing someone dressed as Saville may not be offensive to you but to me and others like me it is not only offensive but incredibly triggering. You are not in a position to say what is an isn’t offensive if you aren’t part of the group/minority being offended. By the same token I understand your point about ‘some university kno*&er’ choosing to be offended on behalf of other people but in making this point you retract your right to NOT be offended by this behaviour.

    • Penny

      With regard to the comment ‘having a good laugh at what was being done effectively in a members club open to those only of Cayley Hall’ – it’s worth mentioning that all of the student dining halls are open to ANYONE for meals. Some thought about whether behaviour or dressing up is offensive to others should be taken into consideration as common sense. It isn’t ‘liberal nazism’, it’s just decency to not make others feel upset or offended.

  • Chris Carter

    The student that may be disciplined is the one who used black make up. “Former Exec Member” Not the ones who dressed as Savile or Pistorius.

  • Ricky Bobby

    Why would you downvote someone who was sexually abused? Like seriously?

  • Political correctness

    Political correctness ‘gone mad’ occurs when people take offence on other people’s behalf – and thus exaggerate the offence caused.

    As Chris is a white middle/upper class male, I don’t really think he is in a great position to comment on this offence. Perhaps leave it to other people who may actually understand the offence caused…rather than simply jumping on an issue – probably for your own political gain or whatever.

    Typical ‘councillor’ type.

  • Chris Carter

    First off – I’m not upper middle class.
    Second what difference does it make what I am or who I am when reporting the news, it’s in the public interest.
    If you want a debate over my political beliefs and motives on this, jump right on over to the comment section and I’ll have that discussion with you there :)

  • Thoughtful…

    Can I just point out nobody has mentioned the numerous Jimmy’s out at the union on Halloween?

    After heading on down to the union with 2 in my party alone they were delighted to find loads of students had also had the same idea.

    If someone finds an outfit offensive then how are they going to cope out of the Loughborough bubble where it really is people trying to cause offense, and not just some harmless uni students not meaning too?

  • Truth

    You have the right to be offended.
    You do not have the right to decide what I can or can’t wear.

    Sorry about that.